|
|
Fort Hall Issues
|
| |
|
| |
History of Fort Hall Indian Reservation and Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes
|
| |
The
Fort Bridger Treaty of 1868 treaty was entered into between the United
States government and the Eastern Band of Shoshone Indians (known at the time as
the "Washakie Band") and the Bannock Indians. This treaty constitutes the
starting point for defining the legal relationship between the federal
government, the Tribes, and state and local agencies. The Fort Hall Indian
Reservation was created by executive order pursuant to the provisions of the
1868 treaty.
For more information about the history of the Fort Hall Indian
Reservation and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes visit the Shoshone-Bannock Web Site.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Idaho laws regarding jurisdiction on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation are
set forth in Title 67, Chapter 51
of the Idaho CodeArticle XXI,
Section 19 of the Idaho Constitution. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The state of Idaho has concurrent jurisdiction over certain matters on the
Fort Hall Indian Reservation. This jurisdiction arises from Idaho's assumption
of jurisdiction under a Congressional Act known as Public Law 280.
Under that federal law, certain states were allowed to assume jurisdiction in
Indian country. Idaho was one of those states that elected to assume
jurisdiction. Pursuant to Public Law 280, Idaho adopted Idaho Code
67-5101. That statute gives the state jurisdiction over Indians for the
areas of: compulsory school attendant, juvenile delinquency and youth
rehabilitation, dependant, neglected and abused children, insanities and mental
illness, public assistance, domestic relations, and the operation and management
of motor vehicles upon highways and roads maintained by the county or state, or
political subdivisions thereof.
Public Law 280 did not require the consent of the Tribes in
order for the state to assume jurisdiction. In assuming jurisdiction, the state
of Idaho did not request or obtain the consent of the Tribes. This failure to
obtain consent, although not required by Public Law 280, is a primary points of
contention with tribal members regarding the exercise of state jurisdiction on
the Reservation. Some tribal members consider this a legal/sovereignty issue,
some see it as a respect issue, and some see it as both.
The Tribes and the state and local governments constantly
struggle to define their legal relationship with one another. The federal law on
Indian affairs is frequently ambiguous or seemingly-contradictory, rather than
clear and consistent. This is primarily a result of the radical changes in
policy towards Indians throughout the history of the United States. The legal
decisions tend to be heavily influenced by the prevailing policy goals of the
federal government at the time the decisions were made. Because of the lack of
clear federal statutes and consistent case law, the various Indian tribes and
the state and local governments are often left to themselves to attempt to reach
a workable resolution to jurisdictional issues.
The federal government is responsible for protecting and
securing the rights of the Indians which arise from treaties which were entered
into between the federal government and the tribes. Because the federal
government is entrusted with providing this protection, it is frequently stated
that the federal government has a "trust relationship" with the Indian tribes.
The United States Attorney's Office is assigned the responsibility of overseeing
the preservation and protection of these Indian rights and federal obligations.
However, the Tribes are also entitled and empowered to take action, including
bringing legal suits, to preserve and protect these rights and enforce these
obligations.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
There are currently no memorandums of understanding to display.
The Shoshone-Bannock Business Council is currently engaged in
discussions with the Bannock County Prosecuting Attorney and the Bannock County
Sheriff regarding the exercise of state jurisdiction over traffic laws within
the Fort Hall Reservation boundaries. The primary component of the proposed
memorandum of understanding is a request by the Tribes that enrolled tribal
members be allowed the option of having their traffic offenses litigated in
Tribal Court, rather than State Court, when the offense occurred on the
Reservation. Power County has already agreed to such an arrangement. The
Business Counsel is still engaged in discussions with Caribou County and Bingham
County.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
The Idaho Supreme Court has placed a link to the Tribal/State Court Forum -
Benchbook on their website. The benchbook is the product of the Tribal/State
Forum's Benchbook Subcommittee. It discusses the laws and customs of the various
Indian tribes residing in Idaho as well as identifying the lawyers admitted to
practice before the various Tribal Courts. It outlines the tribal court systems
and their relationship with other jurisdictions, including citations to these
and other related topics. It also lists the names, addresses, and other
information about the various Indian Tribes.
|
|